Away With All That, Andy
Last night on CNN, Anderson Cooper took Beyoncé, Mariah Carey, Lionel Richie, and Usher to task for taking “blood money” from Moammar Gadhafi (or Muammar al-Qaddafi, whatever) in exchange to perform for members of his family.
Naturally, your local know-it-all is now filling up your Facebook homepage and Twitter timelines with self-righteous bullshit calling these stars – well, namely Beyoncé – coochie poppers for corruption.
Similarly, sites like Salon or spinning ’round their soapdishes asking questions like, “Why is Beyoncé Untouchable?”
Indeed, Drew Grant wrote:
Still, the couple got away relatively unscathed in the media for their relationship with the dictator’s family, which is more than a little odd, especially since both (but especially Jay-Z) are considered political activists in the music industry. How could they not have known who was funding their performances? Are we really supposed to believe that a politically aware power couple like Jay and Beyoncé were just unable to “see (Mutassim’s) halo,” as Mediaite wrote?
I know what you’re thinking, and yes, I’m making this same face, too:
Since when is Beyoncé considered a political activist in the music industry?
I know these days writers increasingly have a lot less time to turn around their pieces, but if you don’t have the slightest idea about the subject you’re writing on opt to sit the fuck down.
Of course, none of this would have happened without Anderson’s segment airing yesterday. It’s yet another reminder of the limits of highly handsome men. I’m trying really hard here not to speak ill of Andy. I love him as a journalist, and as a, well, everything.
Still, I found his segment to be a bit self-righteous last nite. Not to mention painfully predictable. I’m sure he meant well, but I get the feeling his producers meant to get ratings from publicizing this story.
First of all, Beyoncé, Usher, Lionel Richie, and Mariah Carey’s dates with Libyan dictator and his family have all been documented in the press only now are certain people in the press seeking to vilify them for it.
That’s not to say that I believe any of them should’ve taken Gadhafi’s money. At the same time, I do think trying to crucify them now is quite silly. Reason being is I have a hard time believing any of them actually knew what was going on over there.
The American press tends to shift its focus on more pressing matters like Justin Bieber’s hair cut or Kim Kardashian’s left butt cheek feeling cold. As a result, we in America tend to only get international news when the situation is of great severity — and even then news managers somehow manage to attach to some nominal level of celebrity.
Case in point.
So while it’s really cute for people to sit around telling Beyoncé what she should do with her money as if she’s never ever done philanthropic work before, I’d be more impressed if members of the press turned their attention to the source of celebrity (and our collective) ignorance: Themselves. Even better, how about we go after folks a lot chummier with bad folks for far more money.
I will give Anderson Cooper credit for also including President Bush, President Obama, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in his segment, but in the end their scrutiny should’ve started years ago. Plus, let’s stop pretending their roles are on par with the pop stars they were lumped in with.
We gush over the dress Michelle Obama wore while the White House hosted the President of China (CHINA!), the government continues to pay off terrorists with money that would be far better spent here (for “stability” which loosely translates into access to oil in asshole), not to mention how we punish Cubans with a trade embargo that seems utterly pointless now.
I could go on and on and on. Like say, since we’re on the subject of the plight of Middle Easterners, why wasn’t our government given the public whipping it deserved for keeping Hosni Mubarak in power for so long? We’re championing their people for pushing for freedom but it’s the people we elected that used our tax dollars that kept them away from it?
But my anger needs to be directed at Beyoncé, Usher, Lionel, and Mimi?
Unless there’s video of one of these stars kicking down the poor in Libya en route to cashing their checks, or at the very least proof any of them were aware of the situation there I need them to try again.
Even still, as much as I love 360 phrase, “Keeping ‘em honest,” I’d love it if we all kept it consistent.








We all know Anderson Cooper ain’t nothing but a Gaga stan.
Coochie popping for corruption? I love it.
I knew you would write about this! And I agree! I almost tuned to Cooper. Almost. I saw the date of the party and thought why the hell is this such a story now?
I hadn’t heard about the others performing for Qaddafi, but I did hear about Beyonce at the time (she did the performance). And recently, people went in on Kobe Bryant for doing an ad for Turkish Airlines, since, you know, the airline is responsible for Turkey’s genocide of Armenians back in the day. With all those cases, I’m like, they aren’t political leaders, so taking that money is between them and their conscience. Ultimately, none on MY business.
“Since when is Beyoncé considered a political activist in the music industry?” >> Pretty much.
My eyebrow indeed rose when I heard about Beyonce performing for the Libyan dictator’s son (or whichever family member it was)….. WHEN SHE PERFORMED, not NOW.
American media is so inconsistent & full of shit that it stinks like an overflowing sewer.
This is such a sad diversion I can’t stand it. Not even because it involves the predictable , lopsided Beyonce coverage, or even the forming “black pop stars heart dictators” narratives. People are acting like the US and the UK politicians and all were not hobnobbing with Khadafi as of a year ago!
As of 08 even the “Dubya” stated that due to his sizeable 1.5 billion contribution to the Lockerbie victims, that it ended a “painful chapter” between the US and Libya. The same Khadafi who leveraged economic sanctions against Brittain for the release of said bomber from a Scottish prision, a threat to which both the US and UK immediately bowed to. A man who received support from Mandela, visited by Condeleeza Rice, and as of 09 greeted warmly by President Obama. So even the persons who are “political” ie; US President’s, diplomats, and South African president’s have all at one point embraced, or dealt with Khadafi, we are expecting Pop Stars, to be the moral authority?
Honetly?!
And….this outrage is over who performed at his son’s B-Day party? This is a new low for American journalism.
And the bar ain’t that high.
Mike, great work as usual. Back in 2008, the US sent its Secretary of State to meet with the Libyan leader to show a major shift in international policy towards Libya and show the world the US’s improved relations with the country. The media didn’t vilify President Bush or Condoleeza Rice for that trip, but now after this uprising, everyone that ever affiliated with them is being called on the carpet. I bet these same people are driving around in cars, eating food, and wearing clothes that require or were transported by oil bought from Libya. No need for these writers to pick and chose the hypocrites unless all of them are being called out. It’s convenient bullshit designed to sensationalize a story to attract more site traffic and viewers. They should all be ashamed.